Terrorism and Human Rights

When we try to solve the tragedy of September 11, the human rights approach can provide some guidance as a personal and social scientist. Human rights approaches are always concentrated on individual victims of abuse of rights. We turned our eyes to the victims of the September 11 attack, their families, and friends. On September 11, due to the seriousness of the loss of life and the premature nature of attack, they ordered a crime against humanity.

8 "Terror and Human Rights" by M. Gaur (Anamika Press, 2003): "The scenes since 11th September are gradually showing all that influence ... facing continual terrorism, human rights The problem became a major problem of the world ... The problem became more complicated in the context of excessive anti-terrorism activity and the general public's rights and freedom of the general public.23 Same as above: AP Schmid ( See Note 16 above): "... You should be allowed to enjoy human rights, the answer is" yes ". This is the difference between the rule of law and the law. Do they have the same rights as the victims? The answer is "Yes". ... Everyone is equal before the law

The rights of victims of terrorism are protected by human rights law. Therefore, the specific rights outlined later in this manual also apply to victims of terrorism. According to the International Human Rights Act, the state has a general duty to protect human rights. This may mean to establish an appropriate legal framework for criminalizing specific human rights violations and dealing with terrorist victims. 27 There is an obligation to protect the victims of crimes, including acts of terrorism.

The state has an obligation to provide protection against terrorism. Human rights standards place an active obligation on the state to secure the right of life, to free from torture and other human rights and freedoms. Terrorist behavior may violate all rights as an active obligation to protect the state. This does not necessarily mean that terrorist act is equal to failure of national protection. However, if the state does not take appropriate and appropriate measures to protect these rights, the state itself will be responsible for the violation. Therefore, effective anti-terrorism strategies may become part of domestic human rights obligations.