The story of Kurt Vonnegut, Harrison Bergeron, is a story of a third party that implies an omniscient narrator that limits itself to simply arranging events. As an observer. His implicit omniscient facts indicate that he can present his father George Bergeron's idea: "Yes," George said. He began thinking about an abnormal son in prison, Harrison, but he stopped compliments of Blackjack on his head. "(Page 2, page 12-14)
The view of "Harrison Bergeron" is that a third party knows everything. An invisible narrator indicates this, he does not understand the story, but understands the characters, their behavior, and their inner thinking and motivation. There is no person to participate in the story in the story. And the narrator seems to understand the story, its origin, and its consequences as though it is flying around multiple places at the same time. Most of the story was done in the living room of Bergeron, but Harrison's parents saw the television there, but the talker knew something about the events outside the room. Everything that happened to Harrison comes out on television, but at the beginning of the story it is shown that there is at least one event that goes beyond scope, so there is a possibility that the narrator is a third party is a controversy I am brewing. After the law of the disabled