Tension between Freedom and Security

The United States is in a difficult situation. First of all, we are a country that boasts freedom. Even the fourth revision of our Constitution proclaims that "the right of people's security in terms of personnel, housing, documents and influence, and unfair search and foreclosure should not be violated" . It is a country. Americans want our government to guarantee our safety. These two ideals, freedom and security are often contradictory. How can we expect our government to stop terrorism without violating our rights?

For me, considering this question shows how complex this problem is. It results in ancient tension between freedom and safety. However, the media and political response to this latest attack is disproportionate and irresponsible. When it comes to terrorism, it is the responsibility of the press to place national security before rating and competition. The results of the report are not taken into account. In addition to a predictable review of security, police, etc., urgent discussion is needed about how to report terrorism in the media and measures against terrorism in public places.

Like many of us, Mary is experiencing inherent tension between freedom and safety. In other words, it is the tension that arises when we are not in contact with our basic self and are strongly tied to our social self. When this happens, we will participate in an intense civil war seeking peace, liberty, harmony and happiness, but we can not give up on safety, warranty, warranty and verification.

There is an implicit agreement between the state and its citizens that some freedom must be sacrificed in order to guarantee safety. As a result, there is a natural tension between journalists and security services. By trying to reveal the secrets of the government and the security department, journalists trial powerful people. This is a chaotic compromise. Paul Lashmar nevertheless said that this is an effective way. When journalists collaborate with reporters, they often find that the government is wrong and the director's official channel is not stopping. In recent years, we have witnessed information disclosure by chaotic and destructive security guards by Snowden.

The US leadership seems to cope with the tension between safety and freedom by giving priority to safety. Unless we discuss the scope of potential security jeopardy, we tend to take every step to make ourselves safer. When asked to present an identity card, he revealed his name and address, but also revealed religious, racial, ethnic origins, financial records, police and immigration records. (If you have). This is not just a form, it also causes discrimination. Smart cards, eavesdropping on the phone, and device relay information (if implemented) provide privacy protection. Americans are not only afraid that someone knows about them, they are also worried that this deprivation of privacy is misused for personal purposes, even for extortion . These superior law enforcement agencies seem to just shrug their shoulders as if nothing had happened.