tempcolon Confronting Colonialism and Imperialism in Aime Cesaire's A Tempest

In the face of the Arashi colonialism, Aime Cesaire tried to rewrite and rewrite the idea of ​​the colonial era proposed at Shakespeare's "Arashi". By changing the perspective of the story, he succeeded in this attempt. Cesaire transformed the character, converted the scene, revealed Shakespeare's Prospero as an exploitative European force, and Caliban and Ariel as exploited locals. Cesaire's A tempest is an effective response to Shakespeare's storm because he interprets it from the colonial perspective and stimulates Shakespeare as a literary classic idol.

Shakespeare's "storm" provides a variety of possible explanations. It can be seen as a romantic allegory that has nothing to do with imperialism, or a parable of colonialism and colonialism. The next reading of "Storm" will focus on the interpretation of the colonial era and post colonial plays. OED defines colonialism as establishing and forming a community in a new country, while maintaining contact with its own country. However, this term also means rebuilding or destroying a community that existed before, which may include procedures for trade, looting, negotiation, war, genocide, slavery and rebellion Yes. Therefore, colonialism can be summarized as conquest and domination of other people's land and supplies.

Europe's colonialism and imperialism in the Storm of Shakespeare William Shakespeare's play "Arashi" shows how racial "other" ideologies legitimize the patriarchal hegemony of Europe in the Elizabethan era Or not. In the Elizabethan / Jakob era of the UK there were many related ideologies related to the play. Knowledge of the society of the time (Elizabeth England) and how it works in watching the value and ideology of recognition and challenge of this text is wonderful.

If Shakespeare's research itself can be regarded as cultural imperialism, dramas like Arashi can easily be seen as collusion with colonial power. Prospero deprived the invaders and Karabin, who was nervous about the legality of his rule, was a representative of a conquered ethnic group, and his language course was an attempt to destroy his own culture or under the control of imperialism . It is less than. The best way to start this discussion is the 1976 article "Learning the curse: aspects of the 16th century linguistic colonial period" of Stephen Greenblat, although the effect is still not fully understood yet. l

In Aime Cesaire's "Discussion on colonialism", he talked about the impact of colonialism, and believes that "even the most civilized people have lost their humanity." He is talking about the young mark of Kaffir Boy and witnessing his father's "inhumanization". "He seems helpless and regretting it is a scream screaming far away from the harsh, determined and absolute ruler I know him. Father's word is the law" (p. 22 ). Mark observed that a thin line was formed between the races. At the time, white man was establishing the best position for black people, according to Apartheid's law. When Mark's father became inhumane, this was a very big event for Mark. The second part of the author of "Disclosure of colonialism" talks about "barbarism and corruption of colonialism". Black people are treated brutally by their own people. They can bring a person into an animal