Technology has penetrated daily life in an unprecedented way. Computers, smartphones, 3D printers, new medical equipment, sophisticated software, electric cars are now available to residents of developed countries as well as almost everyone else. Will these rapid changes make people's lives better or worse?
Technical giant IBM develops a computer called Watson that can handle learning as well as raw data
Amazon Retail automates several huge warehouses and plans to ship packages with flying drone.
How will machinery improve as much as possible and how will it affect our lives as it becomes possible?
Andrew McAfee, co-author of the Second Machine era, said technology advances have two major economic consequences.
"McAfee not only consumer goods but also health care, entertainment, communication, food, leisure, and more options, more options, higher quality, more variety, lower price products," as well as consumer goods, I am talking.
McAfee recognizes that other major influences are not so positive. In the not too distant future, smart machines may replace more low-level workers and begin to replace more kinds of workers.
"Technology tends to support certain types of winners, they are progressing and leaving a lot of people, so income inequality, wealth inequality, unequal opportunities, lack of liquidity There is a problem facing us, "he said.
McAfee said those who are threatened by these challenges should take advantage of new opportunities provided by technology, such as connectivity and access to high quality education.
"Educational resources offered through technology via the Internet are extremely wonderful today, and we have the best teacher in the world who can offer free courses to those who wish to attend. It is a positive development for him, he said
In addition to personal initiatives, McAfee says the government can support transformation by not only creating new training programs, but also accepting entrepreneurship, innovation and creating an environment that creates new opportunities.
When people first anticipate that technology will have a major impact on our lives, the focus will always be on the technology itself. However, as technology matures, it is not a technology itself that actually affects our lives, but it is a useful product that can be built on the top floor where you can open doors and create new experiences. In this article, we would like to understand some techniques that will help us to improve our lives. Movement is the perfect example of the above process. The bulk of the "platform economy" is to create an interface that connects to people outside the traditional value chain. Uber and Airbnb are not necessarily revolutionary about pure technology (according to today's standards), but are examples of very successful platforms as representing victories in design thinking.
It is impossible to explain superb new technology without knowing the lives and times of those who created them. In the personal story of many pioneers in the computer industry, the influence of exciting cultural and technical mixing in this area can be clearly seen. In fact, personal decisions often have a historical impact. What is interesting about these "own fields" efforts is that it provides opportunities for organizations and key brands to support independent people and support cultural movements. I would like to discuss more about how these independent people exist, where they are, why, and how each organization is supported or not supported.
We can not explore how each new cutting edge technology affects our lives and how it will affect the future. Technology affects the environment, people, and society as a whole. The way we use technology decides whether the impact is positive or negative to society. For example, (positive influence) we can use corn to make ethanol. And it can be used as fuel. Fuel can be used to run machines and cars, which will increase production at lower costs. (Adverse effects) But if we decided to transfer large quantities of corn to fuel production in food production, humans would not have food and it would make the world hunger even worse.