Stuart Greene's article certainly will quote the phrase "there is no new one under the sun". Indeed, Shake Spear, Beer, and Ecclesiastes chapters 1-4-11 are cited when trying to find out who praises this particular quotation. What is important here is that research is essential for writing discussions on every topic. Without research, one person may repeat what has already been said, and this does not promote discussion. Research is indispensable for persuasive discussion, but that is only the beginning.
The subject I discuss in this article is whether or not ontology, cosmology or the theoretical argument provides sufficient evidence to prove the supreme existence. All three discussions support and oppose them, but will they prove the existence of God (which is considered to be the best personal existence in the future) or continue to be a controversial topic? The weakest of the three arguments is an ontological argument. Christian theologian Anselm (1033-1109) believes that we can get the largest possible presence, which is the basis of his argument. He said that the existence of reality is more important than the existence of the soul. In such a case, the most probable fact that we can find in the head is not the largest possible existence. Because, in fact, we can see the same existence.
Discussion of the School poster is the strongest argument about the existence of God. That argument is based on probability, and a small opportunity that even life and the whole universe must first exist. People have always believed that natural selection is acceptable for the evolution of life, but this theory does not explain certain aspects of the universe. "Since natural selection is not a chemical principle but a biological principle, we must rely on other principles to explain why living things come from inanimate objects." 5 On how life exists Proposal opportunity base. Considering this, the probability that the correct chemical reaction occurs at the proper timing is the probability of 1/10 to 1/10. Because this is so big, there are too many things that are likely to happen.