The difficulty that many researchers are currently encountering in the field of rhetoric is that they misunderstood the whole truth of the interpretation of class discourse rather than providing guidance. Often we confuse rhetorical categories with technical categories. This is a particularly annoying problem in professional discourse research. For example, technical writing can be used as a rhetorical category rather than a technical category. As a rhetorical category, engineering writing is a positional heuristic that allows you to explain certain aspects of discourse being practiced in the context of engineering. In other words, the rhetorical category of engineering writing defines a series of meanings as a guide and shows our position on the interpretation of specific communication. Engineering writing can also be used as a technical label for simply grouping all the lighting done by an engineer.
Professional Discourse Classification: Engineering, Management and Technology / Professional Writing Barbara Couture Nebraska College - Lincoln, bcouture 2 @ unl.edu
The solution to the difficulty of Kent in interpreting traditional meaning and discourse discourse is to rethink the category function in rhetoric theory. We need to consider rhetoric categories as a place of meaning of specific discourse. The positional function of rhetorical categories is to clarify the framework of interpretation and to help explain what specific cases of discourse mean. In other words, the rhetorical category is a mark or road sign that serves to locate places in a series of meanings, where most explanations about a particular discourse may exist. The rhetorical category is not a technical label of the meaning of traditional discourse confirmed by empirical observations. Instead, discourse categories represent a combination of empirical observation and rhetoric theory; they move freely - if you want, you can move between the two ways of seeing the world.
Professional Discourse Classification: Engineering, Management and Technology / Professional Writing Barbara Couture Nebraska College - Lincoln, bcouture 2 @ unl.edu
The negotiating speech is speech or writing, and we try to make the viewer take certain actions (or not to do). Judicial rhetoric focused on past events, but careful discourse, Aristotle said, "Always recommend future events," Aristotle ... discusses a possible future We propose various principles and arguments for rhetoric in order to conclude that he views the past as a guide to the future and uses it as a future, a natural extension. "(Poulakos, 1984: 223) . Aristotle believes that discussions on specific policies and actions should be based on past examples, as "we are fortunetelling to judge future events from past events" (63). In addition, the reformer recommends quoting as "Really what happened, in most respects the future will be the same as the past" (134). "