What is referred to as extrajudicial killing or sometimes targeted killing is the "intentional targeting by the government or its agent" (ie intentional targeting by the government or its agent) to specifically target and kill so-called terrorists or so-called "illegal combatants" Direct involvement of hostile actions on conflict)) Not under government control "(" target killing ", Wikipedia). Target killing has been an integral part of modern war for many years and recently every day It is incorporated in law enforcement agencies.
According to Gabriela Bloom and Philip Heyman of Harvard University Law School, target killing has expanded the tension between treating terror as a crime and treating terror as a war. The government enforcing the enforcement strategy must punish individual personal crimes and prove in the court that the accused is protected by appropriate process assurance. On the other hand, wartime governments may be required to bear legal obligations to exploit restrictions on the use of fatal forces in peacetime. Enemy combatants may be targeted and killed as they may not be guilty but may be deadly agents of hostile parties. There is no need to warn beforehand, no attempt is made to arrest or arrest, and the law does not require any effort to reduce enemy casualties. Therefore, the United States has a reason to kill terrorists under the war paradigm.
In a testimony of the US Senate Judiciary Committee, Secretary of Education Eric Holde said, "Litigation against Osama bin Laden is considered a state of self-defense, it is legal to target enemy commanders in this field." Mr. Osama bin Laden said "It is a big step to bring about justice to about 3,000 innocent Americans who were murdered on September 11, 2001." "Said Steven Ratner, a professor at the University of Michigan law school. "It depends greatly on whether you believe that Osama bin Laden is a suspect in combat in war or suspect in mass murder." In the latter case, "If you represent a direct threat, you I can only kill you. "