Taking a Look at Women in Combat

When talking about women or women serving on the battlefield they may face the same problem posed by Laura Cannon of West Point cadet. This is of course a fair question. The female warrior's story is the subject of past glory stories such as Mary Ludwig Hayes McCauley who often began supplying water to the US military at the battlefield of Shan dynasty Fu Fui and Monmouth NJ. Later, she entered the theater to replace her deceased husband.

This is not about the success of women in the battle army. Regardless of the recent media hype surrounding the semantics of 'fighting women', women have long proved themselves in battles and wars all over the world. This is to maintain the most accurate and superior fighting power in the world. If this means that there are only a handful of women who can work in the newly opened battle position, they are chosen not to be sexual, but to be the best candidate for this job . This is equal. It is an opportunity to pursue work at an equal position rather than confirming that it is selected based on gender, lowering standards or satisfying quota.

Until recently, women in the United States were unable to gain military assistance status and could not carry out military service in battle. In 2015, the Pentagon opened up all fighting activities to women, and as of 2016 the ban on women near the British army was lifted. (In other countries like Israel, women are allowed to serve longer in battle troops). Many people believe this is a positive step in achieving gender equality, but there is concern that increasing women's participation in battle roles may be inappropriate and even dangerous Yes.

A woman in battle can make a battle woman handle battle. Should women be able to confront enemies? Women can control emotions and bear the fear of war. It is wrong to appreciate that women are not as bad as fights or women. What I said is that if a woman chooses this kind of challenge, he has more abilities.