Taking a Look at Wikipedia

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that contains public articles that many users can edit. This site is proud of providing unbiased information from a neutral point of view (NPov). However, it is difficult to know the accuracy of the information because the general public provides most of the information. The article to be reviewed and analyzed contains information on the events on 11th September 2001 and information on how to use the wiki as a learning tool. The article starts with an article. "The attack on September 11 was a series of four coordinated terror attacks by New York's Islamic terror organization al Qaeda.

If you just want to answer this question, you can see Wikipedia that was created by many users of the network and has become a major source of information for millions of people. According to Similaraweb, monthly access to Wikipedia.org is equivalent to 600 million. Clearly, this is the world's most popular encyclopedia, a source of knowledge for many people in today's society. Does this mean that today's users trust UGC data rather than regular professional publications? Begin to see how communication should change

I was raised in Wikipedia. When the site was first created, I was 13 years old. Wikipedia was originally a source of entertainment. I will go there to see episodes of the TV series, background information of filmmakers, or movies of actors. Over time, I began using Wikipedia to gain more serious knowledge, so I will look for scientific facts and then it became my news source in a few years. Finally, a few years ago, it became a source of search for information on my politicians, political ideology, political movement. It has become a comprehensive ultimate resource, and my quest of truth begins at the end.

Founded in 2001, Wikipedia was considered curious by people other than Wikipedia 'Sports' in the first few years. However, Wikipedia has become more popular, and in 2005 it became the most popular reference site on the Internet. Popularity attracted attention from the media. Most critics believe Wikipedia is an experiment that is supposed to die by Utopian extremists. For those who did not care or remember controversy at the time, I will list some examples of criticism against Wikipedia in 2005.

It is hard to believe today, but ten years ago it was widely thought that Wikipedia is a fate experiment conducted by utopian militants.