Taizong versus Al Mawardi in Politics and Religion

Taizong's handouts and Al Mawardi's materials can be compared by religious and political similarities and differences. There are many similarities between the two sources, but there are also some important differences between them. For example, their views are different: how the ruler or the emperor should rule their government or empire, the use of the military, and who should succeed and / or be chosen as the government's correct duty Similarity. Based on the fact that the Islamic government must obey the Quran and Sunnah, the government's Islamic structure seems to be far more stringent than the Tang dynasty.

Al-Mawardi placed a caliph (political leader) instead of the prophet Muhammad (khal lfaturasl lillill) instead of a person who directly represents God (khal ___ fatull l h). This was very different from the general rules of the rulers of the day. It is the absolute monarchy and certain kind of authoritarian being influenced by Yahiriya of Roma, Persia, Byzantine and Arabia of those days. Al-Mawardi compares two conflicting schools in the concept of political leadership, the rational school and the Muslim school in the chapter of al-AhkÃ-sur-Sulthâniyah's political leadership theory ("imâ € mah") I began research by doing. . Al - Mawardi supports the second school in consideration of the religious mission that the caliph should carry out, Shariah school supports the Quran (eg QS al - Nisa '59) and political guidance required by Muslims He has a strong base of obedience to the person. 28 years

Islamic political work that first appeared in the first half of the modern era includes Abu Abu Allah Ibn Ali Karai (630 H), Tuftsa Barr Lissert Hvar Tal Val Al Shui Subarachnoid bleeding Research is included. This work explains the government's religious principles and the political obligation to refer to the Quran and Sunnah when executing the government. This work also quotes the various Hadiths of the Holy Prophet, whose political leaders require fairness and avoiding tyranny. There is a chapter that this work rewards a legitimate political leader, and an authoritarian political leader commits a crime. twenty one