T. S. Eliot's Tradition and the Individual Talent

The tradition of T. S. Eliot and the current personal talented poet are not only pros but also much clever than before for reasons of being alive. Key points: - You can work hard for tradition, but you can not inherit it. - The poet discovered the importance by comparing and contrasting yesterday. - The poet gives himself and loses his personality to match the old one. - It is an extension of the past now. - It helps emotions and feelings when forming talent. - No one has personality, everyone is basically the same, this is the accident and the expected experience and impression that led to our differences.

T. S. Eliot said in his "traditional skills and personal skills" that all new literary works changed the literature of the past, in a sense, rereading literature. Dear, this change is more powerful than the most classic piece. However, although this book is new, it always has discreet quality, but it is always found, but it always exists. I tried to explain this feeling (owned) in the novel. I was deeply moved by Toni Morrison's quoting my writing on "Play in the Dark" as an example of "Writing and reading are not so obvious to the author". Mr. Morrison quoted my article as "some examples of reading inseparable from certain writing experiences in my opinion." It will:

My unbelievable English literature student does not know whether this is correct, but I feel that it is necessary to remember T. S. Eliot's iconic article "Traditional and Personal". I think that advice to Elliot's poet also applies to peace educators. According to Elliott, tradition is not a simple act, "to insist on its success to be blind or timid, including chasing the generation before us." In "historical consciousness", this consciousness includes strongly conscious of the temporal position of a person and the way the past continues to the present. In opposition to "capturing the past as a whole" he warned against opposing the "completely relying on personal praise one or two times" and forming a person's idea. He asked the individual "as he continues to abandon himself as he is worth more than now" and asked, "Personality is constantly vanishing."