Sympathy for Two Characters in Brave New World

In the brave new world, sympathy for the two characters Bernard Marx and John "barbarians" was abandoned in their society. They suffer from their own flaws and being unable to adapt. They are two roles in the "brave new world". For various reasons, the reader can feel the most sympathy in various ways. Since the appearance of Bernard is one of his main concerns, he can sympathize with it. As an alpha man, society expects him to be taller, better visible, and masculine than him.

The brave new world and the protagonists of the matrix are indeed similar and different. The main character of "The Brave New World", "John of the Savage", and "Neo" of "Matrix" are both similar because they are brought into the "real world". Barbarian John was brought out of his world by Bernard and brought to a brave new world, and he discovered the world of Shakespeare. Neo was born and grew up at The Matrix and moved from the computer program to the "real world". Because John is taught by two right lifestyles, both of these roles are difficult to adapt to the life in the new society and the surrounding environment. John first introduced an orgy, but he liked the idea of ​​marrying because he did not like it, but this is not accepted in his new world. As he came out of the computer program Neo must first learn how to use his body.

Savage John is a unique character in the brave new world. He is a mixture of his mother's house, the brave new world and his reserved Indian booking. Unlike other characters, he realized all the possibilities and choices that may exist in his life, as he was not restricted by the courageous New World Government. John and Mustafa Mond shared Shakespeare 's work and religious common sense. When John first discovered this, he was very excited and it seemed that he finally established a real connection with another person. What happened was a philosophical argument between the two gentlemen. Knowledge and emotions are reserved for people with a few privileges and can be seen to be too dangerous for most people in a stable society. Mustafa Mond's view seems to be reasonable, but its purpose is not to leave much room for criticism. His argument relies on unverified assumption that stability is the most social goal and physical well-being is a major tool to achieve it.