Supporting the Poor

In the article of Harding, "life-saving ethics" is a way to change the status of the poor to make space for everyone, knowledge of people's life support tools and human innovation, real world needs We do not provide explanation. Social lifeboat. As lifeboat people did not have more space, Harding tried to support this position by "rich" analogy in the ship of life, and more passengers if they accept the ship There is a danger of sinking.

"God has made wealthy and poor people in this world, the same earth supports poor people and rich people, but this manor is mine, this house is mine, my slave is me Because God has distributed these human rights to humans through the emperor and the kings of the world. "Augustin's insight here is that we finally distinguish the right intent of the private property system and the institution itself I will help you. How it works - why and how you work if you like. The purpose of private property is to maintain order that leads to prosperity. In other words, it is to give everyone the safety and stability we need. At the same time, the system itself plays a part through various governance, regulation and social control. In a nutshell, the reason for private property tells us how ethical parameters should function.

There is a long history of helping the poor. But, as mentioned above, obviously the poor have two "types". "Poor" poor people and "low poor people". This means that some people are considered 'worthy' for support and others are not. "Worthy" people may be disabled, elderly, or someone with limited mobility. "It is not worth" is only marked free. Therefore, they will not receive any assistance. These definitions last about 200 years and are at the heart of modern welfare. Today there is a story that robots and artificial intelligence are appearing everywhere. This is an example of a change far beyond personal management. Frequently cited changes (47% of US employment is endangered in 10 - 20 years) seem anxious, but the key to achieving is fear. People at the bottom of society are at the intersection of progress. They also do not adapt too much. Fear, starvation, homelessness, these are all part of the "incentive" of modern economics.