Supporting Arguments for Parent Licensing

In addition, if we propose a standard it will be too general (to include different cultures), it will not be able to distinguish between good parents and bad parents. This excessive generalization will allow bad parents to accidentally gain permission. These are strong opposites to Lafollette, but I think there is a solution. In his proposal, Lafollette points out that "... it is not required to give only the best parents but rather to exclude very bad people", so "parents" (Lafollette 1980) , 190).

In this article, I would like to review the philosophical debate about parental permission. Let's see the classic discussion of Hugh LaFollette with parental permission. This discussion was originally published in the 1980s on philosophy and public relations. Since then, it has been the subject of many comments. After explaining the summary of LaFollette's claim, I would like to look at the recent criticism against Jurgen de Wispelaere and Daniel Weinstock's argument. As we see, they argue that it is clear that licensing is the best approach, although there are some things that can be said to educate future parents and avoid dangers to children To do.

The argument that Hugh LaFollette's defending country should allow parents may be the philosophical version of support for parents' permissions, which is most influential and widely discussed (LaFollette 1980). LaFollette demonstrates this ability through (iii) reliable testing, and activities are regulated by the state, (i) whether an activity is potentially harmful to others, (ii) requires some capacity, I assert that. These standards demonstrate the current license program. For example, medical accidents can cause harm, so doctors are obliged to acquire medical licenses from the state and secure their abilities. Because incompetent drivers may harm others, to some extent skill has to be proved to drive a car. These standards also apply to child rearing. At the time of his paper these tests were just beginning to be developed.