Sukarno destroyed Indonesia

Julie Kumar wrote that his behavior in 1965 had a great influence on the Indonesian government today as well. Human poverty is the main factor in society, but industrialized countries have neglected the lives of some people. The novel "Year of dangerous life" written by CJ Koch reveals Indonesian poverty in 1965. He showed cultural and political turmoil, allowing readers to think about the understanding of most Australian Indonesian culture, despite Indonesia being one of our neighbors.

In the late 1950s, Sukarno changed its Indonesia from democracy to authoritarianism and maintained its power base by balancing the forces of the army and the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI). The coup attempted on 30th September 1965 was counterattacked by the military, leading to a severe purification of communists, Chinese and so-called leftist, during which PKI was accused by the coup and virtually destroyed. The most widely accepted estimate is estimated to be 3 million people, with 500,000 to 1 million people losing their lives. In March 1968, General Army General Suharto defeated politically weakened Soekarno and officially appointed the President. His new order government received the support of the United States and encouraged foreign direct investment, which is a major factor in the next 30 years. Strong economic growth

After independence of Indonesia in 1945, Confucianism in Indonesia was influenced by several political conflicts. In 1965, Sukarno acknowledged that the Indonesian people accepted six religions, including Confucianism, issued Presidential Decree No. 1 / Pn. P / 1965. In 1961, Confucian organization Royal Indonesian Hu Association (PKCHI) declared that Confucianism is religion and Confucius is their prophet. Under Suharto 's new order system, anti - China policy is the main point of political support from the masses, especially after the collapse of the Indonesian Communist Party, which is said to have received the support of China. In 1967, Suharto issued Presidential Decree No. 14/1967 which is controversial. This is a Chinese printed document, Chinese expression, Chinese celebrations and celebration, and that is the Chinese name.