Study on Participants' Reactions to Emergency Situations

Under the conditions of the two partners, only 10% of the ten subjects reported smoking. Under the conditions of three inexperienced bystanders, the experimenters predicted from the results that over 98% of the three populations contained at least one smoke reporter. However, only 38% of the 24 people in these 8 groups reported smog. After 6 minutes of experiments, subjects were called to do an interview. The interviewer asked if the questionnaire is concomitant, and many people reported the problem of smoke.

From the participants' interview answers, it became clear that the individual differences are mixedly involved in the subject's response to the experimental situation. Clear reaction on factors such as confidence, confidence, normative desire, resolution of confusion about the nature of the task. . Asch's report contains descriptive stories of subjects. This remains "independent" and "produced" even after revealing the real nature of the experiment. "Independent" entity says he is happy and relieved, "I sometimes do not deny that I have this feeling: 'I will go with others to cooperate with it' ' (P.182) At the other end, the theme "represented by 11 of 12 key exams", "surrender" theme said: "I doubt the middle - "(P.182) Mr. Asch pointed out that although the subject of" obedience "is doubtful, he is not confident enough to oppose the majority.

Participants in the Davac study examined the images of the two groups 10 to 30 minutes apart. The first is a standard set of images used to study emotional responses. The second group consists of images that are neutral and not emotional. Some participants first observe the emotional image, the other group first observe the non-emotional image. As a result, it is concluded that those who first saw the emotional image are more likely to recall images that are less emotional than those who recall images that are not emotional. In other words, events occurring after emotional experiences are easy to remember. "If you encounter a non emotional experience after an emotional affair, your memory will be better," Davage said.

Two studies were done to validate this hypothesis. By knowing how most people in the community are seeing moral events, individual emotional responses are shifted to descriptive norms. Participants in these studies were asked to indicate their moral or emotional reaction to ambiguity that could be interpreted as a violation of justice / injury, loyalty / authority or purity-related ethics It was. In Study 1, after participants expressed emotional responses, they received false feedback about the reaction of most people to the case. The results indicate that false feedback weakens the intensity of anger response if the participant's response is an unwelcome response. In Study 2, participants received false feedback about the ethical issues of other people regarding the same incident.