Students Shoud NOT Have the Tight to Free Speech

According to Vanderbilt University and the First Amendment Center of New Zeam in Washington DC, there are twelve kinds of remarks which are not protected by the first amendment right. "Obscene, fighting, jealousy, jealousy, child pornography, perjury, compulsion, temptation to imminent lawriness, true threats, defamation, and theft of copyrighted works" (paragraph 2). The center added, "If you promise orally, some experts will also increase treason," he added.

Freedom of speech was once central to the West. In the 1960s left wing college students began campaign of freedom of speech, so we were able to protest against conscription, Vietnam war, and various social injustices. Western progressionists, ideological descendants of enlightenment have long believed that freedom of speech is indispensable for the dissemination and discussion of ideas. To be fair, along with the increasing "political correctness", this trend may actually begin decades ago. Still, the political correctness is mainly to explain the minority with respect, such as respect, and there was no strict limit to the actual idea that can be expressed. However, in recent years, political correctness has been replaced by security statements that do not allow the release of statements that are considered to harm the emotions of a particular group.

I would like to expand the rights of students to freedom of speech outside the White Plaza designated by Stanford University. The government has allowed certain student groups to protest outside the White Plaza on several occasions. I think that freedom of speech on campus should not be left to the discretion of the government; it should be the rights of all students. In the current two-week white plaza event registration process, students can not express spontaneously. We will lobby SAL to adjust registration rules. I also aim to explore ways in which basic standards better protect the freedom of speech and allow political spokesmen on campus.

How much free of speech is free? This is a question for students of today, tomorrow, and tomorrow. In the open network, the best results from freedom of speech are most useful for websites such as Wikipedia, online newspapers, forums. However, these sites can only provide a limited amount of information to students and researchers when studying important, hierarchical and historical topics such as freedom of speech. Understanding history, law, and international perspective will help to provide a background of the current landscape.