Struggle of Freedom and Power

It is widely believed that there is a struggle of freedom and power through history of fighting freedom and power through history It does not deny that this argument lasted until the 21st century. John Stuart Mill's liberal papers raised questions about whether laws really help to force freedom or whether they actually violate it by destroying it. Muller emphasizes that power is reasonably applied to every member of society, and the sole purpose of violating his will is to prevent harm to others.

One of the main objectives of his article is to make the reader think about extreme restrictions and how the law allows the individual to still have the right rights for himself. There is always a struggle between freedom and power (law). The more strict the legal system, the less our freedom. When you think about it, all the laws you pass are another freedom we have lost. Therefore, some people are against all laws. Mill said, "Some people tend to bear the virtue of almost every amount of evil, not the area of ​​human interest managed by the government." Or destroy it little by little

This is a matter of struggle for freedom and struggle for power, which is shown in purely logical language. In the history of struggle for freedom, at the beginning of the struggle for freedom, people have been claimed to have come to the promise of the old regime that it will ensure freedom. Afraid of the revolution, the old state power is independent of people, and it is the power of people, that promises to people to ensure their freedom. But that promise has not yet been realized; as long as there is a government that people can not remember, they can not fully understand it. Thus, at some stage of all revolutionary history, under the influence of lessons learned from experience, the obvious logic of the above discussion will penetrate the broad popular minds of people.

Such a moment comes even in Russia. In history, the struggle in October 1905 was a struggle by the former regime for a commitment to securing freedom. And commitment is the success that people have achieved. But many failed efforts to do more was not a waste. They prepare people for a more serious struggle. The contradiction of the fact that Dumas' national representative "can not do as a result of the promise of freedom, the lack of freedom, the totipotency of the old regime that carries out all the problems, and now the experience of Dumas becomes apparent It penetrated deeply and sharply into the hearts of the popular masses. That is why the Duma meeting for several days is enough to bring in a new wind. This is the reason why signs of free movement going to new realistic steps were revealed early.