Strengths and Weakness of The Qualitative Research Method

The purpose of this paper is to contrast the contrasts and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative research methods that use two journal articles to deal with youth and bullying. The first article (quantitative) is aimed at "establishing a relationship between frequent companions and premature anxiety or depression in adolescence" (Bond et al. 2001, p. 480). Its purpose is "to study the essence of indirect attacks of adolescent girls" (Owens et al.

Both methods have advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Qualitative methods allow researchers to study selected problems in detail and in detail. Working in the vicinity of the site without being limited by a given category analysis contributes to the depth, openness and detail of qualitative research. On the other hand, quantitative methods require the use of standardized tools, so you can adapt people's different perspectives and experiences to a limited number of predetermined answer categories.

Both qualitative and quantitative methods have advantages and disadvantages, respectively. Qualitative surveys allow detailed analysis with details of selected issues without being constrained by predetermined categories to achieve depth, openness and detail. On the other hand, quantitative research requires the use of standardized equipment, so different viewpoints and experiences of people can be adapted to a limited number of predetermined reaction categories in which numbers are specified. The main differences between them are explained in the following table. Features of qualitative and quantitative research (Source: WordPress)

In order to overcome the shortcomings of qualitative and quantitative studies, mixed method studies have emerged attempting to combine or combine the two forms. It is not used alone, but involves the use of qualitative and quantitative methods to achieve the strengths of research (Creswell, 2009). Claywell (2009) defines the hybrid approach as "a way to combine qualitative or quantitative forms or related approaches". Therefore, this method can combine the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative methods (Fellows and Liu, 2008).

Both quantitative and qualitative methods have advantages and disadvantages, respectively. The aim of early childhood early research is to determine the best way to deal with the problem. There is no inferior or superior research method, but rather there is no scientific, objective, and devoted effort of researcher's answer to the question. Therefore, valuable scientific discoveries can be found in either investigation method. References Batchelor, D. and Taylor, H