Strategic Bombing Accroding to Trenchard, Douhet, and Gorrell

Strategic bombing strategy bombing is considered a necessary condition for the National Air Force to visualize the air hegemony during World War I and during the Second World War. Strategic bombing is defined as "deep into enemy territory to destroy war capability." Many theorists including Trenchard, Douhet, Gorrell have different views on strategic bombing. Trenchard's strategic bomb theory focuses on attacking German houses and targeting the enemy's morale. Next, Douhet's theory is based on a comprehensive war concept and German infrastructure.

These beliefs were incorporated into the phrase "strategic bombing" originally proposed by Italian military theorist Giulio Douhet who advocated the widespread use of chemical weapons and biological weapons in the 1920s. Douhet later served as the aviation director of Italian fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. In the spring of 1943, the US and British forces successfully defeated German and Italian troops in North Africa. This experience tells Peter Kessada of the United States and other people who would like to try an incomplete "aerial support" art that would be rewarded if there was a French invasion

Prior to 1939, all the parties were active mostly under the theoretical model of the aerial warfare. In the 1920s, the Italian theorian, Giulio Douhet, summarized the belief that the pilot developed during the First World War and the effectiveness of the postwar strategic bombing. Many people say they can win the war because "bombers will pass by forever". Americans believe that Boeing B-17 "Flying Fortress" bombers can use their own weapons and ammunition using the Norden bomb and have a "kneading barrel" precision. Japan Airlines pioneers believe that they developed the world's best navy pilot

The elements of the war aviation strategy were partially influenced by the massacre that they saw during the prolonged war. Duie believes that the role of air force is almost completely unpleasant and firstly requires enemy aircraft and then rapid and destructive attacks against private industry and commercial centers. Like a duet, Tranchead views aerodynamics as a strategic and worthwhile force. The difference between Trenchard and contemporary Italians is that it is still important to consider the ground military capabilities and propose ground and air joint operations against enemy airports. Early American aeronautical theorists such as Mitchell and the Army Air Tactics College thought that the role of strategic bombing is not to hinder the enemy's morale but to aim the enemy's war capability.