Stop Welfare Abuse Reform Now

There is no doubt that the most annoying problem of immediately stopping reform of welfare abuse is misuse of welfare and other government support programs. Welfare is designed to support families that are economically difficult, but many families abuse these services, fraud, nurture generations and demand welfare reform. Unfortunately, many families raise the descendants of this cycle, believe that they have no intention of doing work and that they have the right to take care. (ODJFS) Alabama state attorney general, people in the state will fraud the benefits.

A: In most states, we are fundamentally changing welfare programs so as to emphasize work. Prior to welfare reform, the main purpose of the National Welfare Plan was simply to give money. But now the information that my family receives when applying for benefits is that they need a job, the "welfare" program helps them find jobs and they have up to five years cash benefits You can earn. As a result, welfare volume has decreased by more than 60%. This is because as many as 2 million mothers join the labor force, women's household incomes increase, welfare income decreases, and the poverty rate of children decreases year by year between 1993 and 2000. By the end of the 1990s, the number of poor children in poor households of black and female households reached the lowest level ever. Even after the recession in 2001, even after four years of poverty in children, the poverty rate of children remained 20% lower than in 1993.

The focus of welfare reform is not to reduce poverty but to reduce dependence and "abuse". (Epstein, 1997) Conservatives oppose the expansion of income disparity and the plight of the poor in the United States, not dependence on welfare. Forcing welfare recipients to work may help the country make you feel better, but that will hurt many poor single parent families. (Edelman, 1997) Even if you reduce welfare allowance or force a beneficiary to retire, you get incentives and empowerment for work, but when someone finds a job it is said that it will be improved I do not think so. Before welfare reform was enacted, half of the welfare recipients already had a job. (Stanfield, 1996) Rather than simply reducing the benefits of welfare and work well-being, do not simply force people to work, but why not increase work welfare compared to welfare?