The book I chose to write was "an explanation of shame of spoiled identity management" by Erving Goffman. Gofman was outstanding from other sociologists. It is well thought that this rebellion is caused by the absence of professional etiquette and some people make it difficult for him to enter his company. But because his love data is not just sociology, Goffman is different from other sociologists. He believes he will not expect much as he mainly publishes his research through the paper and understands that he can only achieve so much current level knowledge in micro social science.
About the topic of spoiled identity management After reading Stigma: Erving Goffman (1963), we resemble the unhappy blind man explained in his book, to those with ugly, cognitive and disabled I am shocked by the fact that I am hated. Specifically, secret behaviors, isolated use, lack of motivation, creation of technical terms, formation of closed groups, social anxiety and avoidance, low mood, seemingly free floating anger, etc. are common I will. When we observe young people and ask questions, we are interested in these adolescent roles and behaviors, the obvious alienation of popular or adult culture, and especially parents' involvement .
In Owen Goffman's book "Stigma - Spoiled Identity Management Notes" it is classified as "ordinary" and "stained glass" and focuses on the social situation integrating them. Many different processes and complicated ways. Between the two "groups" - including their social and personal identity. Gofman uses his comprehensive and extensive citations of most insulted people, such as homosexuals, mentally handicapped, blind or hearing-impaired, ugly people, disabled people, to clarify his claim did. The experience of people who are often insulted is often related to "others" of society who are interested in "shame", not "society" as a whole.
The most definite shame definition was written in his landmark work by Erving Goffman (1963). Stigma: It is annotated with spoiled identity management. Goffman (1963) pointed out that shame is "very reliable, an attribute that can reduce people to people contaminated by one person." . Therefore, those who received stigma are considered to have "identity of impersonation" (Goffman, 1963, 3 pages). In social work literature, Dudley (2000) begins with Goffman's first conceptualization and defines shame as a stereotype or negative view.