Stephen Hawking: God Could not Create the Universe Because There Was No Time for Him to Do So

[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQhd05ZVYWg&feature=player_embedded#! , 32: 45-33: 09 and 37: 25 - 41: 17.

It is important to note that Hawking's claim can only dispute the existence of the Creator God. As long as God can not create the universe and / or has a causal relationship with the material world, some kind of god still exists. However, Hawking believes that there is no time to eliminate the possibility of existence itself, as well as eliminating the possibility of causal activity before the origin of the universe "before" occurred. For me, this means that there is no possibility that creators will exist because there is no time for creators to exist. Unfortunately, Hawking believes that existence is impossible if causality is impossible in eternity. Even if it takes time for causal activities, why do you think that exists? Causality and existence are related, but they are completely different concepts. The fact that one person is impossible does not mean that others are impossible. In fact, I think there is a possibility of the cause entity. Many scientists and philosophers believe abstract things such as logic laws and mathematical principles always exist before the origin of the universe. The distinctive feature of abstract objects is that they are causally weak, that is, they have no causal relationship. If there is even an abstract thing, the impossibility of causality is assumed to mean that the impossibility of the existence itself is illegal.

[3] Alexander R. Pros, "The accompanying to Blackwell's natural theology" "Cosmological argument in Leipnisia". You can access this chapter with pdf http://bearspace.baylor.edu/Alexander_Pruss/www/papers/LCA.html; Internet, visit on 15th July 2011

[4] William Lane Craig "causality and time and space"; http://www.reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7935; Internet access; December 17, 2010 Access

[5] My personal opinion is that God exists in an eternal state without the universe, but it becomes a flash in the creation of his universe. This causalism does not pose a problem for the accidental relationship between God and the universe because the causal behavior that God creates the universe is consistent with the origin of the universe and constitutes the first moment of physical time. Look at what God knows now. : Pursue the relationship between God and time, creation is a temporal behavior

Stephen Hawking revealed yesterday that God did not create the universe. In a series of propaganda complaint before his new book "Big Design" issued next week, he insisted that he / she is not a problem and made some serious accusation of the Almighty. What he said is that our universe inevitably follows the laws of nature. But we may ask, where do they come from? Hawking may be a little rich, giving him / her a celebrity guest after a short history of millions of hours of operation hours, making him / her redundant. In his famous conclusion of the book, Hawking wrote that "If we can find the most basic natural laws, then we should know the idea of ​​God." To be fair, he writes in a metaphor - we all know what he means

In September 2010, Hawking opposed the idea that God can create the universe in his book "Big Design". Hawking previously believed that belief in creators is compatible with modern scientific theory. However, in this study he concluded that the Big Bang is an unavoidable consequence of the laws of physics, and there is nothing beyond that. Hawking said: "Because there is a law like gravity, the universe can create itself from nothing, and we will create it from now on." "Spontaneous creation is something not something, Why does the universe exist, why do we exist? "

In his latest work, Stephen Hawking, the most prominent physicist in the world, challenged the belief in the creation of the holy universe. He says that the laws of physics, not the will of God, provide a true explanation of how life on the planet is formed. He considers the Big Bang to be the inevitable result of these laws. "As there is a law like gravity, the universe can create itself from nothing and will produce it." For many people, there is a proposal for big designers for the right to design - but this is actually what the book intends to deny. Hawking insists: "Spontaneous creation is something rather than something, why the universe exists, why it exists, calls for God to advance the universe with light on the blue touch paper. There is no need. "