Stambovsky v. Ackley

Including a summary opinion of judges or judicial opinions, objections are only for members

You will be a good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted websites for law students and has provided service to more than 97,000 law school students since 2011 It offers. Some law schools, such as Yale University, Vanderbilt University, Berkeley University, Illinois University, etc., have registered all of the law school students directly with Quimbee. Read student's voice

Quimbee is the company that wants it. Make it possible to acquire "A" at all steps of the law school so that you can graduate in class and get a high salary legal job. We are scholars for law school students, as well as scholars for law school students. Learn more about Quimbee

It is written by professors and practitioners of law. I am not a student of any other law. 14,100 briefing mainly including 189 cases. First-class customer support

In fact, questions, rules of law, possession and inference, and appropriate amount of information including consent and objections

Please access on your course for your mobile phone and tablet. Huge collection of related video courses and high quality selection issues

Each case profile is easy to use and uniform. It is not a legal term, it is written in simple English. To summarize our summary and abstract, we do not only repeat the court 's words.

Because of the unusual theme of the case, Stambovsky v. Ackley often teaches property or contract course at law school. In fact, this opinion includes an unexpected phrase "The house is ghosting as a legal matter" (Interestingly, "plaintiff, his horror was found"). There is no possibility of a ghost "in the spirit of fairness", "The giant should be exiled by a single giant from the text of a legal precedent and should rest quietly"; it also quotes the movie Ghostbusters. Therefore, that opinion was known lovingly as the rule of Ghost Busters.

Stambovsky v. In the case of Ackley, the Court of Appeals of the New York Supreme Court ruled that the seller must disclose that he has a reputation for gambling in the presence of a trust relationship or fraud or misrepresentation as the reputation damages the value of the house did. In the case of a lawyer, the seller of the defendant cultivated the belief that it is commonly believed that his house is occupied intentionally. She promised to inform the public about the supernatural phenomenon on her property that she may be saying that she is also responsible for the purchaser of the contract.

Stambovsky v. In Ackley's case, the New York Court of Appeal treated the seller and / or broker's obligation to disclose the existence of so-called property. The court found that neither party had a legal obligation to disclose these ghosts, but the seller could not disclose the story about ghosts to local and national publications and deny its existence And gave relief measures to reject fairness. Stambovsky (buyer) has signed a contract to purchase a house from Ackley (seller) via Ellis Realty (broker). The buyer lives in New York for over an hour from Long Island real estate. Prior to the end, the buyer learned that the house is thought to be possessed by a mischievous. Neither the seller nor the broker disclosed this information to the buyer, the buyer appealed for lapse and damage. Over the past decade, supernatural activities were posted once on Reader's Digest and published twice in local newspapers.

Stambovsky v. Ackley: New York Court reviews the liability to the parties disclosing haunted house information