Southern Pro-Slavery Rhetoric

Nanbu slavery rhetoric By 1860, the slave state had about 4 million slaves that accounted for about one-third of the southern population. But around 1700, religious leaders and philosophers in North America and Europe opposed slavery, believed that slavery violated God's teachings and violated basic human rights. During the revolutionary war many Americans believed that slavery in the United States was wrong because they believed that protecting human rights is one of the fundamental principles of the United States and that slaves have no right I started to feel it.

In the discussion of slavery in the mid-nineteenth century on virtue and evil, the assertion of the southern people who supported slavery, slavery is "necessary evil" to justify it as "positive moral interest" I was born from the idea. From this point of view, this evolution is a reaction to the growing sense of moral aversion to North Korea's slavery, from the South's point of view it is necessary to find a slavery defense that they can stand up from an ethical point of view is there. However, George Fitzfu's defense against slavery is unique. He refused the ethnic divisions that they must include in their discussions, including the paternalistic debate that has been increasingly adopted by the southern people, especially acceptance that slavery has improved the status of slavery - did. In his infamous Southern Sociology publication in 1954, he wrote:

The Southern slavery system is being forced by the Black Code. As Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois State Senator admits, "Slavery can not exist anywhere in a day or an hour unless supported by local police regulations." According to the report, "Black Code" said that she surrounded slaves with walls. Prohibited. He can not leave the plantation unless he passes by. He can not carry weapons. He can not gamble. He can not blow a horn or a drum. He can not openly suck or swear. Without a white man, he could not see other slaves. He can not walk with a cane nor do a "happy demonstration". He can not ride a carriage other than servants. Unless he is an agent of the owner, he can not buy or sell goods. Dogs, horses, sheep and cows can not be kept. He could not visit white or a free black house or entertain them at home. He can not live in a different place from his master. I can not teach reading and writing