South China Sea Disputes: Conflict in a Global Crossroads

In the western Pacific, the South China Sea is a strategically important global intersection for many countries in the world. The South China Sea extends from the northern Taiwan and Luzon Straits to the south of Indonesia and the Malacca Strait, to the west Vietnam and the eastern Philippines and Borneo. In the total area, the South China Sea is beyond the Mediterranean. However, unlike countries in the Middle East, territorial disputes and contending arguments threaten the movements of world trade through the South China Sea, impairing the stability of the region in the Asia-Pacific region.

The tension in the South China Sea reflects the global temperature rise. The heart of the conflict is what parts of the South China Sea are claimed. Under the International Maritime Law, it is stipulated that the State manages 12 miles from the coastline and has exclusive rights to water bodies 200 miles apart (these are nautical for the exact person). Archipelago is a place where rules are difficult to handle. Making soil on existing coral reefs, China has made seven new islands in the past few years. By dominating this new "land", China has greatly expanded the area of ​​the South China Sea. It is said that this covers almost all areas. Not only architecture but also China are reinforcing these islands. Aircraft hangers and other armed weapons indicate that China is adopting a new territorial claim. American think tank CSIS was the first person to post fortification information and established an excellent website in the South China Sea.

The South China Sea Law (2018) is generally enforced (gate). This paper argues that the resolution of the maritime conflict in the South China Sea should be based on a universal framework to protect the world ocean interests. In this article, a universalist framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1982 and a universalist approach to eliminate "professional" maritime claims made in the South China Sea court on July 12, 2016 This section explains. Strict Ocean Evaluation Criteria

Resolution: The United States should unconditionally take part in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea