Sources and their Support that the Failure of Prohibition was Inevitable

The cause of failure and the prohibition of its support were inevitable in 1920, and the prohibition order came into force in the United States. Production, sale and transport of alcohol are forbidden. Thousands of illegal stills and millions of gallons of wine and spirits were destroyed. However, the ban on alcohol also leads to a significant increase in the crime rate. The ban was ended nationwide in 1933, but some states continued to ban drinking. However, prohibition of failure is inevitable.

Not all sources indicate that prohibited order failures are inevitable. Source A states the factors leading to the prohibition order, but it does not indicate that the prohibition of failure is inevitable. It raises the view that everyone initially thinks that the ban is believed to work, but before it begins. It also pointed out that there were criminal offenses due to alcohol ban. Unfortunately, it does not explain why this happens to information sources. Furthermore, it does not mean that the prohibition order itself inevitably fails. Source B looks like Source A, but it is not forbidden to fail before it begins; it includes public demand and alcohol, and it also suggests Al Capone's proposal . Source E is the same as source A.

Two main sources of information were used to carry out this survey. One source of information was Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 157. MarkThornton banned alcoholic beverage failure. This is a detailed report on the prohibition of facts and impacts in the United States. It was studied and published in 1991 with the aim of introducing to the audience the specific facts related to the crime and how it led to the failure of the ban. The value of this document focuses solely on the facts that are banned and forbidden, so there is little bias and there is no fixed remark. It is also because this prejudice has not completely disappeared, but since it was drastically reduced, it was also released in 1991, 58 years after the ban was abolished. Another value of this article is to include not only the facts gathered by a single person but also the ideas of various writers. This was a wonderful job and made an important contribution. "

Considering the history of repetitive failure of alcohol and alcohol abstinence (Thornton 1991). Breton and Wintrobe (1982: 150 - 151) tells why bureaucrats directly manage the "source of responsibility" of crime and other problems (eg alcohol bans between 1914 and 1937, prohibition of conviction) Two reasons to explain The drugs reaffirmed drug control in the mid-1960s and mid-1980s despite the history of failure of these policies. Secondly, it is deprecated as the result of policy depends on the input of several different groups and stations, and the set of possible control methods is very large when a subset is selected.

Learning BUREAUCRAIOR Behavior: Affect the literature of public choice * Author: Economics, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 Professor Bruce L. Benson Identification Study at Florida State University, USA