In the novel "Son and Lovers" by D. H. Lawrence (Lawrence) of the hero Paul Morel, it represents a typical expression of "mother's boy". Mrs. Morel was very demanding and felt that Paul was suffocated and I felt there was nothing to love others. Paul bothered his mother. It was an obstacle to the successful relationship between Miriam and Clara, the two most important women in his life. In Chapter 7, Paul expressed his hope to share with his mother.
D. H. Lawrence 's son and lover' s psychoanalysis and feminist 's psychoanalysis and feminist' s way is a relatively recent serious response to literary texts. Applying to Lawrence's son and lover both have both insight and problems. Psychoanalysis theory, the main to determine Freud together, like the study of Freud, to apply their common imagination to literature and art, to study their performance and possibilities of dreamlike, content can do.
My son and lover. Lawrence's prominent autobiographical novel said that a young protagonist Paul Morel attracted two women while trying to remove his manipulation and a strong mother's shackle . My son and girlfriend were widely criticized for discussing at the time of publication about the sensory entertainment and accusation of the social exploitation of central British parliament and industry. Since then, the modern library has included this novel in the ninth place of 100 novels of the 20th century.
42 According to some critics, Lawrence sought to compensate for the "white peacock" of "son and lover", but said this is only a mother 's fault. In fact, Lawrence's attitude is contradictory in both novels. My son and lover show respect for my mother, but from my standards, the portraits in the novel are not entirely informative. The protagonist expressed sympathy to her, but his father abandoned his father from his family circle. This shows how long Lawrence is and how you can understand the nature of the dispute between parents. Mrs. Morel is respected, destroys her life, destroys the spirit of her husband and gives psychological damage to her son. When she eventually disappointed Moller, she dared to face her child and her love was deep and serious. Mrs Morel was deliberately sharing the pain, not deliberately pleasing her children.