Solving the Foreclosure Crisis

I would like to solve the problem of foreclosure. People need money to pay for mortgage loans. They need to work. Unfortunately, companies are not interested in adopting for a bad economy. But before the people spend money the economy will not improve, and they can not afford it unless they pay. People can earn money only by working in business. This is a cycle of self-destruction. This is the reason why the government has to intervene to help. First of all, you need an important campaign. It is important. Because the United States needs a bigger and better social program, and because many people who are confused call this sort of thing "communist".

The problem of solving the foreclosure crisis first raised the question "Is there really a foreclosure crisis?" The crisis is indeed in danger, but it is not caused by foreclosure of mortgage loans. . Foreclosure is a mechanism to deal with debts that people can not borrow. The potential impact of housing foreclosure (slowing down by the "affordable family plan" of the Obama administration) is actually a market, not a debt but a crisis. The history of the world economy has experienced sovereign debt crises such as Latin America in the 1980s, Russia in the latter half of the 1990s, and Argentina in the early '00s. The debt crisis in Europe is the most important thing in the business world since 2010.

Over the past decade, we have seen a number of initiatives to solve social and economic problems. In order to truly solve the foreclosure crisis it is necessary to revitalize the American spirit. Society as a whole has problems in every era and decade. Social problems such as the world war in the 1940s, the Cold War of the 1950s, the protest of the 1960s and the decade of civil rights, the energy crisis of the 1970s, and the AIDS of the 1980s. - Wilkinson & Pickett (W & P) claims that society as a whole will become healthier, more successful, and happier if the gap between the wealthy and the poor grows. The "spiritual books" they wrote in 2010 are one of the most influential social policy books ever, and that not only influences inequality on the bottom of the ladder, I believe it will affect people. If social indicators are more equal in society as a whole, rich countries will make better results