Socrates’ Trial Defense in Terms of His Values

In his apology defending the trial in accordance with his values, Socrates talked about a trial that led him to make his friend and mentor Socrates executed. The account shows that the defendant of Socrates is fundamentally different from his own values ​​and they get annoyed as he tries to prove that they left them. These differences caused conflicts between the parties and ultimately led to his trial. As the jury accused Socrates' s death penalty and understand that his defense made him happy because he gave him the truth, he is most prudent for him as he thought this was the best he could do I thought. Good thing

This article would argue that during the "Socrates trial and death" Socrates might have offered better arguments about his defense. First, I will outline prejudice and accusation Socrates must face during the trial. That then shows how difficult Socrates is, and he wants to lose the case, and in the end it will end the discussion Socrates may give to be innocent. - All conflicts of Socrates's greatest condemnation and Athenian law in political philosophy are the conflict between philosophy and politics. The problem of philosophy being politically friendly is still left. Questioning an authoritative view is not easy to achieve, it is not a philosophical field - it is not pursuing wisdom. Socrates is a fighter of the conflict. Political factors arise from the point of political life, but Socrates' question is "What is the best system, how should I live"?

In his apology defending the trial in accordance with his values, Socrates talked about a trial that led him to make his friend and mentor Socrates executed. The account shows that the defendant of Socrates is fundamentally different from his own values ​​and they get annoyed as he tries to prove that they left them. These differences caused conflicts between the parties and ultimately led to his trial. - Albert Einstein said, "Because the problem of people handling is the same, there is no difference between size and problem with regards to truth and justice issues" (Brainy Quote). Justice and truth are part of the Socrates trial. The main question is: What is justice?

An apology is the defense of Socrates in trial. Socrates pointed out that when the dialog began, his accuser had warned the jury of the eloquence of Socrates, and Socrates said that the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates tells the truth It was said. Socrates distinguishes between two groups of accusers: early complaints and late accusers. Since they did not appear in the courtroom, the early group was the most difficult to defend. - Socrates paper The responsibility between the citizen and the law, and vice versa, is also a challenging question many people have been trying to answer for centuries. Throughout history, many philosophers, historians, writers etc have tried their answers with their best view and have offered to some extent. Plato provided such a window to understand the nature of the country through the Socrates dialogue of the human soul and made such an attempt.