Socio-Economic Consequences of China’s ‘One-child per Couple’ Population Policy

Only these children can build their own relationship outside the home, but single children can not share their social capital with their brothers (Webster 2007). One-child policies may increase the proportion of rural children to urban children, thus promoting the exploitation of urban-rural relationships. The SRB of the city is lower than that of the rural areas (citizens who have registered labor) (farmer registration is not so advantageous), because they are in line with the policy and are likely to get permission before delivery 1995: 568; Li 2007: 2-3).

Considering this dilemma, a practical Chinese adopts so-called "one-child policy", and the couple can have no more than one child. Their intention is economics and politics. By reducing the population and increasing the average standard of living, we will achieve political stability. This policy implies a reduction of 300 million meals that is open to China both economically and socially. With revolutionary genetic technology, these couples can choose the baby's gender and confirm that they are born without any harmful disease. I hope you like healthy children, all families, very much, and having the best food and education means that our seeds can continue to grow stronger and live

Today, China is the world's most populous country with a population of 34 billion people. This country adopted one of the most rigorous and mandatory population management policies in the early 1980s - one child per family policy. This policy reduced the growth rate significantly, but it caused many socio-economic problems and controversy. However, the success rate of China's declining birthrate due to one-child policy is lower than the success rate of women in certain areas of India (Kerala etc.). This indicates that people are no longer a problem, as economic growth is dull, as people are focused on empowerment of people, especially women.