Socio-Cultural Mobility

Conflict, integration, messages, and social mobility were always formal topics in Latin America 's history. Regardless of whether it is a social and cultural mix between Indians and Europeans, Indians and Africans, or Europeans and Africans, the theme of Mestazza and the social structure of Latin America are It can not be denied that it is almost deterministic. . From the formation of this era of revolution to various aspects. Such a cross mix and combination of groups and people across various social classes, and myriad cultural in the region, political, religious, but we have brought the economic strengths, the most interesting is

In short, thought to be the core of this paper, socio-economic, that the ethnic and cultural diversity can have on social cohesion of individuals and populations, the positive effect on the economic performance and social mobility is there. These issues (social cohesion, economic performance and social mobility) have a positive impact on the tolerance and respect between individuals and groups. Current city policy, intolerance, racism, discrimination, for anxiety, etc., it is often focused on the negative aspects of diversity, to be devoid of a positive view on the diversity of the city It is common.

Poverty is a socio-economic problem. Socio-economic problems are factors that adversely affect individual economic activities, such as lack of education, cultural and religious discrimination, over-population, unemployment, corruption. Poverty is also a variable that determines the socioeconomic status of a person. It means the position of an individual or group in a hierarchical social structure depending on the combination of variables such as occupation, education, income, wealth, residence and so on.

There are two kinds of social mobility. The first is absolute mobility, which is the sum of individual movements through socio-economic structure. Absolute mobility is determined by comparing the social class (parent social class) with the origin of the adult social class. This mobility can be increased or decreased depending on the change in occupational structure. Another type of mobility is relative. The possibility of considering the movement of the relative liquidity society depends on the start position. In society, the opportunity to acquire a place in the structure of a professional class is not determined by the origin of the person's social class.

Social mobility is usually the vertical mobility that individuals and groups move up and down from the socioeconomic level, usually by changing work or marriage. Nonetheless, social mobility can also refer to the horizontal mobility of moving from one location to another that is the same social level, as someone alternates between two equally authoritative occupations I will. In some cases social mobility crosses generations when a child acquires a higher or lower identity than parents. At other times, social mobility is within generations, which means that people change state in their lives. Mobility between generations of generations is considered generally worthy of praise and can be regarded as an indication of equal opportunities in society.