Society

Norms are also known as social norms, behavioral rules or standards shared by members of social groups. The norm can be internalized - it can be included in an individual for integration without external compensation or punishment, or it can be implemented through positive or negative sanctions. A social unit sharing a specific specification can be small (eg a group of friends), or it can include all adult members of the community. The norm is more specific than values ​​and ideals. Integrity is a universal value, but the rules that govern the implementation of integrity in a particular situation are norms.

There are two ways of thinking about why people follow the norm. Functionalist society school argues that the norm reflects a consensus that a common value system through social development is the process by which individuals learn their group culture. The norm is said to have been developed to contribute to the functioning of the social system and to meet specific prerequisites of the system. Conflict schools think the norm is a mechanism to cope with the repetition of social problems. Marxist dispute theory argues that norms reflect the power of certain parts of society in other parts but that enforcement and sanctions adhere to these rules. The norm is thought to arise from the means by which classes and castes dominate and use others. Neither school fully explains the difference between society and society.

Norms are also used to represent statistically defined criteria or average behavior, attitudes or opinions of social groups. In this sense, it means actual behavior rather than anticipated.

"The atomization society invites a totalitarian movement," Kornhauser warned. In mass society, individuals who do not meet the group are cu, and in totalitarian society he is a criminal. In a diverse, open and forgiving society, individuals who do not meet the definition of others can find their own community and self freely. This is the Internet community we have to build. As Kornhauser said, we can understand today: "Numerous societies support liberal democracy, popular society supports populist democracy." Two of the majority ("popularity is I do not agree. But our platform and media are not made to support the majority of people. Mass media is built for conflict with the masses and they are worried about the playing card base as the platform is built as if all connections are the same.

Mass media and active civil society are two important elements of strong and healthy democracy. The purpose of this paper is to analyze how media and civil society can be a way to strengthen democratic governance. Without free media and active civil society, senior government officials have large, unrestricted political power which leads to corruption and anti-democratic behavior. With unified democracy, the media and civil society need each other. Without free media, there is no active civil society. For the prosperity of democracy, the two must complement each other.

Participants in civil society, in particular civil society organizations (CSO) and media, can act as a judicial supervisor and as a force for accountability. Civil society is an important element that limits authoritarian behavior, strengthens people's empowerment, and improves judicial quality and comprehensiveness. Experience shows that, without significant public pressure, governments and other state agencies are unlikely to increase the transparency and accountability necessary to curb official misconduct. Therefore civil society officials must engage in dialogue and pressure and negotiations with judicial and political authorities to change the justice system and ensure the implementation of new areas and international protection systems in the domestic justice system and institution It will not.