Society and History of Class Struggles

History of Social Struggle and Class Struggle At first glance there is no possible relationship between the 16th century Shakespeare plays and the 19th century dialectical philosophy expressed by Marx and Engels. However, as a result of prudent research, the development of modern Shakespeare England shows that social and economic concentration, which produced the essential features of the original modern nation state, appeared in England in the 16th century There.

Marx and Engels wrote at the beginning of the "Communist Party Declaration" that "the history of all existing societies is the history of class struggle." But class struggle is a struggle between people who use political and ideological systems of superstructure and people resisting them to maintain the productive "foundation" and the power of exploitation. Marxism does not believe that political struggle is only automatically and passively reflecting the development of military production. It is economic development that created the power of the class to fight for social control. However, the progress of this struggle depends on political mobilization occurring within each class.

As a historian, Karl Marx makes the history of society of the past very important. He believes that the history of these societies is actually the history of class struggle, or rather the history of struggle between oppressors and oppressors. In fact, class struggle is one of the fundamental principles underlying Marxism. It is this doctrine that evolves around the concept that all human societies except primitive society are divided into several categories including permanent and confrontational conflicts. Marx said:

The Open Line is large enough to summarize Marx's central claim that "the history of all existing societies is the history of class struggle." In the cursed page, Marx says the history of the class relationship is "suppressed by free men and slaves, aristocrats and civilians, lords and serfs, guilds and skilled workers, in other words oppressors" I explained it. (9) fundamental conflict. Since the abandonment of this discrepancy was integrated after the industrial revolution, two final levels of power were established between the ruling class (called bourgeoisie) and the working class (called proletariat). For all ages of evolution, this division of power and relocation of individual hierarchy do not require governance, philosophy, not revolution. In this way, Marx discussed his most fundamental concern about power and control, not capitalist society, assets or wealth.