Societal and Individual Interdependency in Salinger's Catcher in the Rye

In a perfect world, everyone is satisfied with their own way and everyone accepts the difference. Unfortunately, the world we live in is not perfect, everyone will not accept who they are. Whether someone can not be satisfied with their life or the difference with others. The answer is 'Yes'. The reason for discontent is society. It is no wonder that people seem to be "lost" and desperately looking for their place under the sun, as society tells what the masses are and what they can not accept .

Security guards of JD Sarlinger JD Salinger's famous and respected novel, a barbarian security guard, reflects Holden Colefield, a problematic teenager, in the surrounding people and society itself. Supercritical View This role has a remarkable vision of the world that morals, principles, wisdom, purity, and innocence should transcend money, gender, and power, but clearly these are I acknowledge the qualities have been expelled. - J. D Salinger successfully showed his personal opinion of the world through his role at the catcher, Holden Colefield. Cobb Field fights the background of New York to portray the theme of Salinger - you must obey the real world of life, not the world you want. Publish Saringer 's View of the World. Salinger experienced many experiences experienced by Holden

J. D. Salinger's "catcher in rye": The symbol behind the book "catcher in rye" was written by J. D. Salinger. This book is based in particular on the life of Sarlinger. The symbols in this book are very developed, have a lot of relationship with Holden's personality development, and explain his feelings about something in life. - The eight early comments of "The Catcher in the Rye" published in 1951, J D. Salinger's first novel, "Catcher in the Lie", was the most controversial novel of the time It was one. The book received many criticisms, no matter how good or bad. Smith felt that the book should be "read more than once" (13), Goodman said "This book is disappointing" (21). Eight of the critics have good and bad aspects for this work.