Social Science Approaches to e-Science: Framing an Agenda

Ease of use / practicality (a way to strengthen financing by improving understanding of practice, user expression, and human-computer interaction)

No value / trial neutral (measurement dimension of distributed communication and collaboration)

Advocacy / guidance and coordination structures (decentralized communication and collaboration, institutions that promote economic and legal structure.Promote specific types of open and accessible electronic science)

Critical / reflective or prospective (social impact of electronic science; ability to submit claims; policy)

Ease of use / practicality (a way to strengthen financing by improving understanding of practice, user expression, and human-computer interaction)

No value / trial neutral (measurement dimension of distributed communication and collaboration)

Advocacy / guidance and coordination structures (decentralized communication and collaboration, institutions that promote economic and legal structure.Promote specific types of open and accessible electronic science)

Critical / reflective or prospective (social impact of electronic science; ability to submit claims; policy)

Ease of use / practicality (a way to strengthen financing by improving understanding of practice, user expression, and human-computer interaction)

No value / trial neutral (measurement dimension of distributed communication and collaboration)

Advocacy / guidance and coordination structures (decentralized communication and collaboration, institutions that promote economic and legal structure.Promote specific types of open and accessible electronic science)

Critical / reflective or prospective (social impact of electronic science; ability to submit claims; policy)

Ease of use / practicality (a way to strengthen financing by improving understanding of practice, user expression, and human-computer interaction)

No value / trial neutral (measurement dimension of distributed communication and collaboration)

Advocacy / guidance and coordination structures (decentralized communication and collaboration, institutions that promote economic and legal structure.Promote specific types of open and accessible electronic science)

Critical / reflective or prospective (social impact of electronic science; ability to submit claims; policy)

Scientific exchanges here are widely defined, including formal exchange through publications and informal exchanges, ie sharing of results not in the public domain. The potential impact of electronic science is that the boundary line between them may be blurred.

In a recent academic paper titled "The Economist's Superiority", M. Fourcade (University of California, Berkeley), Y. Algan (Science Doctor of Paris) and E. Ollion (University of Strasbourg) compare social science with each other, and are trying to quantify that today's economics can be said to be dominant. This article sometimes reveals and documents the strengthening of trust among major economists who I think they are superior to other intellectuals in social science.

Is social science scientific? Which is a better way of natural science or social science? Although the "hypothetical reasoning" approach may apply to natural science, it is thought that it has nothing to do with social science. By analyzing different levels of research, this paper proposes that social science is a scientific judgment. First, I will explain the concept of research and science. Second, by accepting the difference between social science and natural science, we summarize the features of identifying social science from natural science. There are many ways to do research. At the philosophical level, the research method can be summarized into an inductive method and a deductive method. Qualitative research and quantitative research are distinguished from each other in terms of methods. In this article, after briefly explaining these concepts, compare and compare various methods.