Social Psychology: Counterfactual Thinking

Generally, those who regret are considered to be sorry for their behavior. But you need to be aware that regret is another feeling of guilt. Like many others, I regret a lot. Some of them are not so important, others are important to me. In this article I will explain the three main regrets of anti-factual thinking in the life of social psychology.

The literal meaning of anti-factual thinking is the process of thinking contradictory to facts. When one wants to change the cause of actual occurrence and analyze the situation that may be caused by the cause of the change, he starts to think that this situation may be different from the present . For example, when a person survives a traffic accident, he starts thinking about ways to prevent accidents. He started thinking that he might not cause an accident unless he had to speed up. This is an anti-factual imagination

Studies have shown that anti-factual ideas can produce negative emotions; nevertheless, they have some beneficial and functional effects (Roese, 1997). They will also start as people begin to have anti-realistic ideas

"Repentance is based on counterfactual thinking," says Amy Somerville, a semi psychology professor at the University of Miami, Ohio, specializing in regret research. Humans tend to think that if they have "... if I have ..." or "if there is ...", we must harmonize with the reality of real world reality. Post bias is an important part of this puzzle. It is because we will think that we can deceive ourselves and make better decisions. "The broad theme of human perception is that we are good at interpreting the world in a selfish way," Somerville said. "There is a tendency to imagine that we can not actually see the opportunities that they have in time," it seemed obvious to buy bitcoin at that time. Then do you really have enough money to return?

Anti-factive thinking is an important part of effective social activities. Mainly for the purpose of regulating continued behavior, they also stimulate further creative assumptions, let us think more. One of the reasons that anti-factual stories are so attractive is that anti-factual thinking can further reflect us.

The functional theory of anti-factual thinking is based on the process of comparative judgment. Anti-fact is basically a comparison between actual results and virtual alternatives. The comparison process has been a central element of psychosocial thinking for many years (eg Festinger, 1954; Mussweiler, 2003; Thibaut & Kelley, 1959). For example, Markman and McMullen (2003) discuss themselves comprehensively on anti-factual thinking comparison process, pointing out the similarity between social comparison and time comparison in those REMs. For various types of comparison (anti-factual, social, temporal), these authors distinguish between two treatment modes, reflection and evaluation. In a sense, the reflection process is empirical and you can think of a pseudo-realistic simulation of a potential alternative as if it were true. Inch spare)