Social Democracy Cures Social Inequality

With the advent of capitalism and urbanization, the spark of enlightenment has rebuilt the world we know, in the past hundred years. This revolution promises wonderful, but as time and experience proved, this is not the case. Most of the people who live today live in poverty and suffering, and there is little chance of avoiding it, but the main goal is to live a small number in a luxurious and affluent environment. The most important problem in our daily life and sickness is poverty and social democracy can heal it.

The main problem here is whether the argument that political democracy has some influence on social inequality is effective. In the struggle for social equality, what role does political democracy play? The iterative theme in comparative social analysis is the development of political democracy that emphasizes political equality and brings about a broader social material balance (Bertram, Christopher, 1993, p. 215). Finding the truth of this statement is one of my tasks in this article. The achievement of democracy in social justice assumes that political equality is an important feature of a more democratic country (Fleurbaey, Marc, 1995; p 33)

There are four types of institutions (it can be authoritarian or free): 1. Democracy (social equality) and democratic political state (political equality): democracy. Democratic society is tied to the aristocratic political state. Since the political system ends by reflecting the social state, this regime tends towards democracy and it will be in the future. 3. Social Inequality and Political Equality (According to Tocqueville, this is chimera). 4. Social Inequality and Political Inequality: Nobility

Inequality hurts the resilience of democracy. Inequality exacerbates political prejudice, impairs social cohesion, and impairs trust and support for democracy. On a global scale, the state uses various types of welfare systems to manage the unstable effects of inequality and produce very diverse results. This guide provides a broad overview and summary of democracy and inequality investigation from the perspective of comparative political economy, to complement the detailed analysis of Chapter 6. Comparative political economics is a dynamic research field that identifies mutually relevant research institutes. Explain why some countries are more effective in developing welfare systems to cope with inequality than others. "Guidelines" outlines the main trends and concepts in literature, and the explanation of the most controversial type of welfare system.