Social Comparison theory

In modern people, people tend to compare themselves with others. There is no limitation; they just compare their homes, their cars, their families, and their wisdom. Sometimes I question the analogies of their own and I wonder why they have to compare and contrast. The truth is that there is a tendency for mutual comparison among most human cross cultures. When academic intelligence is used to compare each other's social intelligence and cognitive intelligence, experts may find a difference between the popularity and degree of acceptance of social measurements and perceived popularity . Cillessen, Scholte, Segers, and Spijkerman, 2010).

Social Comparative Theory Social Comparative Theory is a theory that can be applied to a deeper understanding of the image of the body and self esteem. According to Fertinger (1954), individuals tend to evaluate their opinions and abilities by comparing them with others' opinions and abilities. Personal awareness and how others evaluate them affects individual self esteem. There are two types of comparison, up comparison and down comparison. These may increase or decrease mental health such as self esteem when compared with perceived superior or subordinate personality.

The three self model suggests that social comparative theory is a combination of two different theories. The second theory is about factors that influence the influence of self-evaluation and social comparison on self-judgment. Although much research has been done on comparative motives, there is little research in the field of comparative evaluation. According to the background of current judgment and enlightenment from social cognitive theory, self interpretation is considered a related concept, the model tests assimilation effect and distinguishes three types of self-concept of work.

The social comparison theory originally proposed by social psychologist Leon Festinger in 1954, its central point of view is that individuals have a motive to get accurate self-evaluation. This theory tells us how individuals evaluate their viewpoints and abilities by comparing themselves to others in order to reduce uncertainty in these areas and to learn how to define themselves explain. Since its founding, the first framework has made some progress. The important thing is to understand the development of the motivation that makes up social comparisons and the social comparison of specific kinds that will be done. Society-related motives include self improvement, maintenance of positive self-evaluation, elements of attribution and verification, and avoidance of closure.