It is difficult to eradicate poverty in the United States, but Peter Edelman is still optimistic. In his book "So Rich" So Poor Edelman sought action. Through this book, there are four important points that support Adelman's reasoning: (1) we must understand why poverty is still common in the United States, (2) only Americans in 2011 The income that you must consider extreme poverty is 6 million shocking food tickets. This fact itself has created an urgency for promoting Edelman; (3) expansion of income disparities should be regarded as a moral problem; (4) substantial progress has been made in poverty alleviation If so, bold political action is required.
Reservation summary: Very rich, very poor, very poor - Why is it so hard to eradicate poverty in the United States (2012), Peter Edelman discusses a series of poverty related issues. (Peter Edelman is a faculty member at Georgetown University School of Law School and serves as a center teacher director for poverty, inequality, public policy, specializing in areas such as poverty, welfare, justice, constitution etc.) The reason is "fundamentally, in the past 40 years our economy was not very friendly to the people in our whole second half, even if it is now being threatened by Paul Ryan, I As we have shown, we have released more than 40 million people from poverty through public policy, from social security, medical insurance, Medicaid to stamps and income tax deductions, as I indicated earlier I will.
Peter Edelman: HNWIs, the poor: Why is it so difficult for the United States to achieve poverty eradication (2012, Press): Nixon appointed Donna Dramsfield to lead the same opportunity, nobody is doing It is from. In the 1960s, Edelman worked under Robert Kennedy and then resigned before Clinton signed the "welfare reform" bill of 1996 in the 1990s, but Clinton's own words are "a lot of stupid things" was. "Thomas Byrne Edsall: The Age of Crunch: A way to reproduce rare American politics (Doubleday, 2012): Although the authors write some helpful books on the growing rights, he should argue more There is a tendency to admit that it is skeptical.In the future there are problems of realistic rarity and manufacturing problems but it can be solved with a wise person than Edsall.