Smart Move: Gardner's Intellegence Types

Before we began discussing the two psychologist theories about different types of intelligence in the classroom, I had never thought about any type of intelligence. According to Sternberg's Ternary Intelligence theory, my image is suitable for analysis of intelligence and slight adaptation to real intelligence. In analytical intelligence analysis by Sternberg, he says: "We achieved good results, had a high track record, achieved good results with traditional intelligence tests and SAT tests, and later entered competitive universities later" (Santrock, 2013, p.

Cognition - context theory involves how cognitive processes work in different environments. The two main theories of this type are American psychologists Howard Gardner and Sternberg's theory. In 1983, Gardner challenged the single intelligence hypothesis by proposing the theory of "multiple intelligence". Early theorists even thought that intelligence included multiple abilities. However, Gardner made a step forward and thought that intelligence was multiple, at least language, logic - mathematics, universe, music, bodykeeping, interpersonal relationships and internal interpersonal intelligence.

Howard Gardner is known for his multiple intelligence theory. In his article entitled "Circular Version: Multiple Intelligences Theory", Gardner explains seven intelligence and reasons for "smart" individuals in these areas. One of the definitions of his intelligence is "It is necessary to be able to solve certain cultural contexts and problems affecting local communities and fashion products" (Gardner 509). School education and education are very important

Gardner proposed seven types of human intelligence, linguistics and logical mathematics are the first two types he pointed out - "It is generally appreciated by educational institutions such as schools and universities" (Gardner, 1999 , Pp. 41). Gardner summarizes the definition of intelligence by saying that it can be applied only to a specific interpretation of human understanding and behavior, and finally becoming the most immoral "normal person type and person The kind. It is not intellect in itself (p. 77)

In the context of Gardner (usually in most other interpretations and definitions of terms) there are different intelligence, but it is not a measure or reflection of the type of emotion. Intelligence is emotionally neutral. It is not an expression of happiness or sorrow by itself, it is not a feeling of good, evil or evil. People have a series of intelligence - not mere level of intelligence. This is the main driving force of Gardner's thinking, and the fact or claim that intellect is not a scalable aspect of one's style or ability. Historically, it is surprising that this concept still exists today in many people, institutions, and systems, and that intelligence is considered measurable in a single situation. Or low or average intelligence; or a person is considered "smart" or "intelligent free". The gardener proved that this concept is ridiculous