Slavery in Aristotle's Works

Before we seriously investigate all aspects of Aristotle's political theory, we have to spend some time admitting that many of the agencies and doctrines he defended have been denied by contemporary political thought. Indeed, many of these agencies are shocking and morally wrong. One of the institutions is slavery. Aristotle of politics believed that slavery is fair. There is no need to argue that Aristotle made a terrible moral and moral error in keeping slavery.

In Aristotle's "Proof of Slavery" and Seneca's "About Master and Slave", the two authors expressed opposition to the principle of slavery. Aristotle stated slavery as inferiority of destiny and material attributes greatly proved this, but Seneca emphasized the importance of philosophical freedom material freedom. (Page 58). - Slavery has existed for centuries in places with the lowest social status such as Africa, the Roman Empire, the Middle East, but due to the increase in labor and relations, the importance in British colonial slavery It is increasing. Britain is the reason and result of colonial slavery, as a result of legalization by law.

Before considering the final position on the fairness of Aristotle's slavery - for whom and under what circumstances is slavery appropriate - there is a big difference in opinion on what this position is It is necessary to point out that. Aristotle believes that slavery is fair and beneficial for his master and slave. This can also not be denied (which means that this should obviously be enslaved but not at the present moment). How do you decide which group belongs to which group, how do you think Aristotle should think the consequences of his slavery belief should be more difficult?