Sino-Tibetan Affairs

The "Tibet problem" develops into a comprehensive Western situation and environment, controlling the uncertainty of the national identity of Tibet, the euphemism of the impossibility of Tibetan political fate. As the future problems of Tibet become increasingly hopeless and as many Tibetan people are irritated, the Chinese government only seems to be getting tense that there is a foresight to find a solution. The future of Tibet and China is more or less invisible, but it plays a role in clarifying its rough and depressed past.

Chinese belongs to the middle Tibetan group. Medium Tibetan is a combination of the main language genes of the Indo-European language (German, French, Hindi etc.) to which English belongs. The Middle East - Tibetan community spread from northeast India to northeast China, and billions of people live in Southeast Asia, South Asia, East Asia. Chinese itself is not a language, it is a family of languages ​​like French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian, and Swiss romance. Like romance, Chinese languages ​​can not understand each other (this is why they are made into different languages). However, since they have a lot of common history and commonly used vocabulary and grammar, it is easier for people who speak Chinese to learn other Chinese than a complete foreign language. Likewise, the same is true for romantic languages.

Most linguists classify all Chinese as part of medium Tibetan language with Burmese, Tibetan, and Himalayas and many other languages ​​in Southeast Asia. This relationship was first proposed at the beginning of the 19th century and is now widely accepted, but the reconstruction of Han and Tibet is much less reconstructed than the department that speaks Indian European and European. Difficulties include language diversity, the lack of distortion in many languages, and the impact of language contact. In addition, many small languages ​​are used in mountains where hands are hard to reach, and in many cases it is a region sensitive to the border. Without secure reconstruction of the original Sino-Tibetan people, the high-rise structure of the family remains unknown. It is usually assumed to be at the top of the Chinese and Tibetan-Burmese languages, but it has not been proved to be convincing yet.