Similarities and Differences between Humanity and Universal Love

Love is often regarded as loving affection for people and people and that happiness is important to you. In ancient China, famous philosopher Confucius introduced the human virtue in the spring and autumn era, Mozi advocated another virtue and universal love. Universal love is a practical love, human beings are impractical love. Universal love promotes love without distinction, and mankind is broad love based on dear piousness.

In the poem, Robert Bridge's "Ego ΩΣ" and Anne Stevenson's "God of Love" have a clear concept like God of love. As human beings believe that God's love is a god of love and desire, "Epome Σ" represents the concept of love; as Stevenson's poem says, Eros is a human being's constant misunderstandings It is hurt so you will be beaten. Therefore, both verses resemble a constant struggle between love and humanity. - There are various interpretations in the story of love in "symposium". In our time, our view on what is appropriate love is quite different from the views of Socrates and the Platonic era. For them, love is love, love is a direct translation of love. However, the word itself is not the only thing different from love. Plato's "seminar" has a celebration of Agathon.

Plato's seminars provide us with a theory about many different perspectives and love. Platonic love, because I understand that it is only two love in a non-semantic sense. Among these readings, Eros advocated the idea of ​​love, and it never lost relevance in the trial of time. But what is it? This is the idea of ​​many different people with the theme of love, there are all kinds of thoughts to choose in order to form a theory that fully includes all love.

In science, everything in the universe has the same basic pattern as elementary particles. We believe that humans and animals have love, feelings, and emotions. Why are things like tools and places not resembling? Or is love, emotion, emotion true? These remind me of the project "Where is love".

Universal. Yes, there is a difference between the way we need to be loved and the way we like it. I agree that what we call "love" is a realization compound of the two. However, although there is something in common about "healthy love", I think that it is not so healthy and strict to say that the rules are healthy. We are quite distinctive what you need and what you can provide and we agree with your optimistic vision. So leave at least a sufficiently large margin, then we will describe any love as "bad" or worse, no one can give "love