Shouting Fire: Stories From The Edge of Free Speech

This documentary examines the constantly changing interpretation of the first revision of the Constitutional amendment - the scope of these lawsuits and the choice of trials will expand amendments to protect the freedom of speech and assembly, I narrowed it.

The movie's argument is that after the Sept. 11 attack, the government received unprecedented supervision, intimidation, arrest, and civilian and foreign detention.

This movie reviews the case of the Pentagon paper and compares it to the case of 9/11 incidents including high school speech and protesters marching in New York during the Republican convention of 2004.

Fire cry: The story at the end of freedom of speech has explored freedom of speech in the United States through contemporary cases where the first amendment played a very important role. This documentary not only focuses on the issue of freedom of speech in our country, but also an American who does not want or wishes to abandon civic liberty in exchange for national security in the days after 9/11 We are also paying attention. Film director Liz Garbus talks about the story of a movie with her father, lawyer of First Amendment, Martin Garbus. Garbus gave his own personal experience and other historical references to show off the story through other important periods tested with the first amendment in the domestic history, including the McCarthy era We led us through use.

Fire cry: The story at the end of freedom of speech is a documentary on freedom of speech and the first amendment instructed by Liz Garbus in 2009. The main content of the documentary is Martin Garbus, First Amendment lawyer who talked about past and present freedom of the press in the United States and Ward Churchill case. As professor of ethnographic research at the University of Colorado, Churchill announced controversial articles on the September 11 incident, and was dismissed after investigating academic cheating related to other issues. The film also explores the cases of Debbie Almonte, Chase Harper and protesters at the 2004 Republican National Competition in New York City. Respondents included lawyers such as historians, law scholars, and Floyd Abrams, David Horowitz, Eric Fonner, Donaree Berman, Daniel Pipes, Richard Posner, Kenneth Star and Josh Wolf.

Careful banning for practical reasons is to ask the crowded building to shout "fire" (when there is no fire) or to keep everyone silent when the professor speaks at the university lecture included. The argument in these incidents is that the actual demand for the situation is that freedom of speech is actually prohibited. Changing this to allow freedom of speech may expose unproblematic ways to risk. The last field where freedom of speech is restricted is power. The focus of discussion is that some powerful people use their power to promote their views. They drowned the opposite voice. People may think public school system is a powerful means of determining children's opinion. In order to avoid this, people may argue that they must give equal time on the opposition issue.