I think most people agree that equality of philosophical consciousness will make this answer "yes" - even if they feel a bit uncomfortable at this conclusion. However, we recommend that this question is meaningless in practice.
Draft is a redundant management mechanism. The implementation of the current draft is a thing of the past and we do not have a computer library containing digital indexing information for all Americans. If you want to choose a random person to serve in the army, you can contact the Social Security Administration Technical Support by phone. The actual registration draft is merely an early obsolete relic and can be abandoned without adverse effects.
The concept of draft may be outdated. Today, war business is a complex technical problem. Not only can you throw rifles in someone's hands and make them function effectively. A military model that relies on a large number of unskilled soldiers is not an effective combat form. If you unconsciously need millions of civilians to participate in minimal training, you are losing.
Since the heyday of the draft, the military tactics / strategy has changed a lot. Spear tip - infantry - is not common in the army. Works like "truck drivers" and "suppliers" have more military experience than infantry. In addition, the speed, range and accuracy of weapons creates situations where killing infantry is not the most realistic for you. Dangerous enemies are aiming at the truck drivers and suppliers mentioned above - if they do not exist, the infantry will soon get confused. Therefore, if there is a draft, the draft will be primarily concerned with the replacement of support staff, not infantry. Especially because there is a high possibility of finding civilians who have experiences as replenishment staff instead of combat infantry. . I do not think anyone thinks that men are inherently more advantageous than women in terms of supply staff.
The last point worth mentioning is that, from a political point of view, women's participation in the military makes it more difficult to deploy troops. People tend to make big progress in war on their sons, but when their daughters do it they are very depressed.
The Department of Defense recommends that women have to sign up for military drafts. Currently, only male citizens between the ages of 18 and 25 need to register, but I think many people should apply for draft including women. Some people are still heading for women to participate in the draft and are still discussing whether women are suitable for battle. However, including women in the drafts is arguing that it helps to promote gender equality. What do you think? The report says, "In most cases, expanding the scope of the draft to include women seems to further enhance the current benefits associated with the selective service system." Join the selected service system
Several Backgrounds: The idea of ​​supporting gender equality in the draft is that it is logical and unique if Ashcut's defense minister releases all fighting activities to women in December 2015. It is fair. It revived forever. After all, in 1981 the Supreme Court supported male projects based on the fact that women are not qualified to play battle roles and are now women. Furthermore, there are symbolic problems in the workplace. There is no one particularly wishing to draft, but supporters think that it is worthwhile to clarify that women have the same obligation as males as men.
Men are obliged to sign up for the draft and basically endanger their lives. Women in the U.S. are not compelled to sign up for the draft, but in other smaller countries, both men and women have to pass the selective service plan developed by their own army not. To many of these countries, having more people is essential to build a successful army as they have much less population than the United States. Likewise, in Israel, "Under the Israeli law, it is stipulated that at the age of 18, both men and women must serve military service for two to three years" (Cohen). This indicates that both women and men have the same obligation. In some circumstances, it has been shown that they play equivalent roles in building communities rich in gender. Together they overcome their burden.