Should we save land for endangered animals?

Many animals are currently in danger because they are harmed by human beings, such as destroying the forest, looking for fun, doing sports. Several groups and people protect these endangered animals by looking for lands secured for these poor animals. In contrast, some people think that land for human purposes such as farmland, housing, and industry is more effective. In my opinion, some space should be allocated for injured animals. The following paragraphs explain all the reasons.

Back to the basics, all the lives of this universality are equal. I think that everyone agrees with this sentence. There are not only the right of some people but also the rights of animals. They all have the right to live in this world like humans. I think that we should respect every life in this world.

To hurt or threaten these animals is to hurt yourself. There are many food chains in this world. Those animals and humans are in these food chains. We neglect to look after the endangered animals, ignore ourselves, our children, and the children's children hurt and destroy our animals It does.

Another reason, the best place for animal life is the forest. We rescued the animals, rescued the land for them, and finally we can save the forest. In the forest, we can not refuse to have massive natural resources such as mineral resources, trees, scarce plants, etc. which are resources of the world. In addition, the forest maintains the moisture of the land and provides drinking water. Water can grow vegetables. In addition, you can even keep water in the water.

In short, for all the reasons I explained above, I'd like to say I agree to hold or hold some land for really endangered animals.

In the 2012 survey it is estimated that $ 76 billion (£ 49 billion) will be spent annually to protect endangered species of terrestrial animals. Saving all endangered species of marine life may be more expensive. Why do we use this money for wild animals? Can you use it to prevent people from dying from hunger or illness? In the 2000s, according to the concept of ecosystem services, we are talking about "humanity" now. Even if you do not buy the moral argument that "wild things and places have immeasurable intrinsic value" there is a stubborn practical reason for preserving them. You do not have to worry about the mountain gorilla to understand the value of the strong ecotourism industry.

Do you know that endangered animals represent nature's diversity? Every year 800 animals are extinct. Because these animals have not received sufficient help or support, animals are in danger of extinction. Since animals are important, endangered animals need to be saved. Animals represent nations and citizens. These animals are very rare and valuable to the country, so you need to preserve them. Since endangered animals are valuable to scientists and the economy, endangered animals need to be saved.

The viewpoint of rights is not against the efforts to protect endangered species. It only claims that we know the reason. From the viewpoint of rights, it is not necessary to protect endangered species of animals, not because the species is in danger of extinction, but individual animals make effective claims It is because it is. B) The narrator understands that the view of Taker's culture is in the hands of "God", ie no longer follows the rules of adjustment of ecological and biological balance. However, it is satisfactory because divorce people live according to these regulations, work hard too hard, never have to accept the benefits and difficulties of life according to the laws of nature.

There is no need to conserve land for endangered animals. As we all know, economic development is very important to us. It will enrich us and improve our standard of living. The farmland gave us food, the house gave us evacuation centers, the industry gave us money. You may think that some animals like Giant Panda are sights of sightseeing. We can benefit from tourists. We can not deny that we can benefit from tourists, but who can promise that tourist resources must be higher than industrial resources? Not all endangered animals will attract tourists. Therefore land use for arable land, housing, industry is clearly more valuable.