Should We Legislate Morality? Essay

If it is immoral, is it also illegal? In the United States, we should not pass legislation focusing mainly on ethics, we should adopt only the law with civil law values ​​as our main focus. In this case, civil value is worth guaranteeing social security and order such as traffic law and zoning law. Our founder also advocates more important value like freedom, democracy and freedom.

I have two basic reasons to hold this view. First of all, we live in a secular society. There is another wall between the church and the country, but I think it is correct. The church and the state should unite only in theocracy, and the United States is not one of them.

The law may be a good idea as we must consider whether there are other worldly reasons or civil reasons in the law. Many people believe that the moral law is black-and-white; if actions that they believe are unethical are illegal, then it is legal and legitimate for them to act unethical . If illegal things are immoral, this is wrong. Even things like murder should be wrong. They did not see subtle differences in the laws that required other worldly or civil reasons.

Rather than trying to establish morality based on legal grounds it is reasonable to try to make the law ethical. We do not want laws to ask us to do unethical behavior, but we do not know if we would like to ask the law to always act on us morally. This is because life in a specific field is private and may not be considered a business of government. For example, we may think that a lie is immoral, but it does not mean that we want a law to enforce honesty and lie and punish us. Of course, there are many unethical things such as killing, theft, rape, etc. that you need to be punished by law.

It is said that "legislative morality" can not be done. I do not know what this means, but we know that we can be legislated ethically and should do so. It is based on the creation of the national moral doctrine, and as the basis of all its founding documents. Pornography is an extreme and insidious attack against natural law and countries based on natural law must ban it. Again, we have never said that we should not ban anything. I said that I should not ban guns. The gun is protected by the Bill of Rights. Porn is different. A gun is a tool that can be used to protect our freedom. Porn is different. There are many positive uses for guns. I will not porn. The gun is an ethically neutral one whose danger or benefit is completely determined by the person using it. Pornography is not morally deteriorating waste, quality of redemption, and aggressive application.

Legislation should be moral, but morality should not be legislative. Morality is the most powerful argument, whether it is left or right, to prove their unlimited demand. Better reasons should be given to what you are doing, not just because it is right. Of course, everything we do as a country should be correct, but that alone is not enough. Both sides of the discussion believe that they are right; the winner should not be someone who can be more emphasized. Personality is very important. I would like to have an excellent person leader who is not an unethical leader with my consent, but rather a significant policy difference with me. As a calm self, I admit that the real optimal policy is unknown, so it is best to have a leader with a framework of better decision making than my corruption with my consent.

Should Congress be legislative ethics? I mentioned the potential impacts of ethical legislation. These factors need to be considered before weather determination, and we should adopt the law to develop specific ethical guidelines. For example, like 200 years ago, we have to take into account the moral changes to some extent. Women can not vote and blacks are accepted by animals. We have different ethics today, and now we know that past morality is wrong. So how do we prevent this from happening again? Whether past mistakes will help eliminate future ethical legislation. No, as a developing country, we have to learn from these mistakes and continue to develop. We need to use our own abilities to make laws that provide moral living standards to people in this country.