Should we have gun control?

Universal background check - ... not enough to prevent criminals and mentally handicapped people from gaining guns. General background checks are that there is another system (eg prism) predicting crime in advance, that there is a viable way to stop it, and because there is no such procedure, The check is to filter only a few criminals. passed. A universal background investigation is an attempt to mistakenly restrict US citizen's gun right.

Large capacity magazine - ... can not be adjusted perfectly. In catastrophic situations, the probability of survival depends primarily on time, so the magazine's capacity will vary depending on the user's preference. Reloading the magazine or cylinder may result in a loss of time, which may be fatal. However, it is clear that these conditions are very rare. Restricting the number of people in a magazine may have a huge impact on hunting. Also, if "militia" is necessary, you can lower combat efficiency.

Ammunition and weapons stockpile - In order to comply with the second amendment "controlled militia" citizens need to control the number of firearms they possess and do not track or permit them. The legality of weapons should be checked only at purchase.

Psychological evaluation - This is a good example of "emotional reaction" of mass shooting cases. Only if all US citizens are completed every X months can be done in the field of gun control. People's mental health decreases in different periods. They may be totally healthy when they purchase guns, and they need serious psychological support after 6 months.

We are not saying that we should control guns. The truth is that gun control can not be accepted as its premise is that the government can trust to do the right thing. The problem with this idea is that the government should not be trusted by the US base. I know little about this problem, so I can not come up with an exact solution. Therefore, we do not assume the legislators to tell what they should do. But I will leave this: what I have to do. For students who were killed by Columbine. For students who were killed by Sandy Hook. Finally, for students who were killed in Stone Men Douglas and recently at Great Mills High School in Maryland. We should be responsible to them, and more importantly, we should pay our children now and in the future.

We are discussing the identity survey in the United States, gun control and gun violence. Will Federal Fire Treatment be changed, and will the second amendment be abolished or reinterpreted? Should guns be banned? What sort of gun should be further restricted? How is the Donald Trump agenda on this issue? Let's participate in the discussion and vote! At February 14, 2018 Parkland High School held an endless story, the last known high-profile, deadly American massive shoot. 17 people died. According to the "Economist" report, this is the first 1,607 large shooting cases in the United States since the 2012 Sandy Hook attack. On 5 November 2017, the church of Sutherland Springs, Texas, killed 26 people and injured 20 people. On October 2, 2017, fire at the participants of the Las Vegas Country Concert, 59 people were assassinated and more than 500 people were injured. This is the most serious mass shoot in American history.

This article originally was written in 2017 for the massacre of Las Vegas. The situation in the United States is a tragic reality, but you can change 2 to 3 words about gun control throughout the article, but there is no difference. The reality is the same: shooting. Gun control saves lives. This is not a controversial matter. In 1996, Australia faced a similar dilemma. Tens of people lost their lives and many others were injured when they launched guns in the town of Port Arthur in Tasmania. In the face of a massive recovery of gun ownership, the conservative government has developed a series of gun laws agreed by the country - agreed by the state - the most restrictive in some developed countries It is considered. of